Simon of Cyrene. Why Is it Important That Simon of Cyrene Carried the Cross?

The Saviour fell to the ground under the burden of the cross. After their efforts to get Him to continue on His way, the Roman soldiers are in trouble, looking for a solution to the situation. According to Roman law, they could force a traveler to help carry the burden for a mile. They found Simon of Cyrene, seized him, and put the cross on his back to take it after Jesus.

Simon of Cyrene was a Jew who had come to Jerusalem for the feast. To hasten Jesus’ execution by crucifixion, the soldiers forced Simon to carry the cross, which weighed about 40 kg, a distance of 1 km from the fortress of Antonia to Calvary.

Carrying the cross of Jesus, a transformation took place in Simon’s heart, a conversion of heart and mind, as proof that Jesus Christ can heal us through the therapy of the cross. The grace received by Simon of Cyrene, the first to be healed by Jesus through the cross.

Why is Simon Cyrene important?

Simon of Cyrene is referenced in Matthew, Mark, and Luke as the one who conveyed the cross of Jesus to the area of His demise. Since Cyrene was situated in Libya, many have recommended that Simon was a darker-looking African man who had come to Jerusalem to venerate during the Passover. Notwithstanding, his identity is undoubtedly obscure since his old neighborhood was determined, and numerous Jews lived in Cyrene during this time.

Simon of Cyrene is important because he was the one who carried the Cross of Jesus Christ. The well-established realities given about Simon of Cyrene incorporate the accompanying. To start with, Simon was an admirer of the God of the Jews. This probably implied he was a scattered Jewish man who had returned for the Passover festivity.

Second, he was a dad and had carried his two children to commend the Passover. You will find their names in Mark 15:21 as Alexander and Rufus. They were possibly mature enough to travel to Jerusalem from Cyrene (a reasonable 12 or more established at that point). Nothing is referenced to their mom, so her status is obscure. Third, individuals from Cyrene were among the primary Christian adherents on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:10). Maybe Simon, Alexander, and Rufus were among the individuals who heard and accepted. Assuming this is the case, the association of Rufus in Romans 16:13 wouldn’t amaze them.

Biography of Simon of Cyrene

[table id=171 /]

Biblical places from the times of Simon of Cyrene

What happened to Simon in the Bible?

Simon of Cyrene is referenced in Matthew 27:32, Mark 15:21, and Luke 23:26. Imprint’s form refers to the that he had two children, Rufus and Alexander, and Luke’s rendition specifies that Simon was coming into Jerusalem “from the nation.” Jesus, who Pilate had sentenced to death by execution, was leaving Jerusalem accompanied by the Romans, conveying his cross to Golgotha.

According to biblical scholars, Simon of Cyrene had to carry the cross of Jesus Christ, and after the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, he believed that Jesus was The Son of God. And he preached the Gospel to Samaria. He is one of those intriguing individuals we momentarily find in the execution story, whose part feels even more significant because we get a brief look at him. He’s there briefly, then vanishes, yet seeing everything he did and understanding the foundation tells us something powerful.

The strolling toward Golgotha was a public occasion where Jesus (and the two criminals who were additionally censured) strolled down roads with individuals watching their advancement. This was significant since general disciplines were intended to be dishonorable occasions. Casualties must be made into objects of ridicule, sending the local area a message about what happened when you overstepped the law.

Why did Simon of Cyrene carry the cross?

This was great for me to contemplate because I’ve perused that multiple times and have not stopped, as so many of these inquiries drive me to do. Furthermore, that is genuinely significant. Once in a while, when creators are detailing realities, they give us clear information and pointers concerning why they are including those realities and what they believe we should gain from them. I don’t see evidence or conclusive education here or in any Gospels for why the Gospel essayists incorporate this reality.

Simon of Cyrene had to carry the cross because one of the soldiers told him to do so. One reason might be that Simon, who conveyed the cross, has become a notable presence in the early church. Hence, the simple reference to his name capacities is one more verifiable proof. It would like to say, “This man not too far off that you know, he conveyed the cross.

The explanation is because, in Mark 15:21, Simon is known as the dad of Alexander and Rufus. That is an uncommon snippet of data. Furthermore, Mark is sometimes related to Peter as a Gospel author, Peter is related to Rome, and in Romans 16, there’s a man named Rufus.

Did Jesus or Simon carry the cross?

Jesus had gone through a genuinely horrible few hours. Kindly consider the accompanying sections put in a request of His experience and focus on the actual injury he got before He showed up at the cross at any point.

In the New Testament, it is presented that both: Simon and Jesus conveyed the cross. John 19:17 doesn’t say that Jesus told the cross alone. It says he bore his cross. He got the cross until he could not convey anything else than Simon helped. A logical inconsistency happens when one articulation offers one more expression inconceivable, yet both should be valid. There is no logical inconsistency.

The charge would convey the cross shaft to the spot of execution. Jesus began to get it. However, he essentially couldn’t bear it extremely far after all the actual injury He had quite recently gone through. He fell. At that point, the Romans drafted Simon of Cyrene to convey the cross the remainder of the way.

Who made Simon carry the cross?

The cross produces in every believer an inward change, after the pattern experienced by the apostle Paul and described in Galatians 2:20: “I have been crucified with Christ, and I live… but it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.”

Simon of Cyrene was originally a simple pilgrim in Jerusalem who Roman soldiers forced to carry Jesus’ cross up the hill of Calvary as a kind of transformative physical exercise. Indeed, Simon didn’t die on the cross, but Christ died for him, too, as he died for each of us.

Finally, Christ’s cross changed Simon of Cyrene’s direction from hell to Calvary and then to heaven, following the example of the thief saved on the cross. In addition to the shame of the cross, we can also speak of the respect of people for Simon, who, according to the Bible, won his family for Christ.

Key Verse related to Simon of Cyrene

“As they were coming out, they found a man of Cyrene named Simon, whom they compelled to carry His cross.”

Matthew 27:32 (NIV)

Simon of Cyrene

Why Is it Important That Simon of Cyrene Carried the Cross?

Jesus Christ was crucified so that people could be forgiven of their sins. The year the Saviour was crucified on the Holy Cross has been intensely debated by historians. After much analysis, it has been concluded that the event occurred on Friday, 3 April, in the year 0033 AD.

Significantly, Simon of Cyrene carried the Cross of Jesus because Simon represents the common man, a sinner. For Simon, it was a chore, probably being tired as well; it was something he had to do although he had not planned for it, plus it was also after almost a mini-day of work. He had to carry the cross of a charged person.

After the Savior was taken down from the Holy Cross, the other two were thrown into a nearby water cistern. In time, this cistern dug into the stone was dismantled, and people began to throw rubbish into it.

What happened to Simon after Jesus was crucified?

The record of Simon of Cyrene is exceptionally concise. However, it is vital. As the Lord started his journey to Calvary, it appears He was conveying His cross as we read in John 19:17, “And he bearing his cross went right forward into a spot called the spot of a skull, which is brought in the Hebrew Golgotha.” It was standard for those condemned to death to convey their crosses outside the city’s doors to be killed.

According to historical and biblical scholars, a year after Jesus was crucified, Simon of Cyrene was executed. For reasons unknown, Simon was made to convey the Lord’s cross for Him. Matthew, Mark, and Luke all tell us of Simon. How about we read Matthew 27:31-32, “And after that, they derided him, took the robe off from him, put his attire on him, and drove him away to execute him.

What’s more, as they came out, they tracked down a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they constrained to bear his cross.” We can appropriately infer that due to the awful beatings the Roman officers had done to the Lord, He was too feeble to even think about conveying His cross anymore, so Simon was made to give it the remainder of the way to the slope called Golgotha.

Primary Takeaways

As Jesus was strolling, the Romans halted Simon, who was cruising by, and they made him convey the cross. Simon said the cross behind Jesus for an undefined measure of time, conceivably the whole way to Golgotha.
In the conventional Stations of the Cross, Simon conveying the cross is the next station, trailed by upright ladies sobbing as they see Jesus strolling toward Calvary.
Supposing Simon had wanted to do something else in that hour, he couldn’t move forward because carrying Jesus’ cross to Calvary was inevitable. In a roundabout way, Simon became a co-partner in the work of salvation through his extraordinary physical effort.

Conclusion

We should check out a few prophetic bits in the book of Isaiah that recount the Lord’s merciless beatings. Isaiah 50:6 says, “I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to them that culled off the hair: I concealed not my face from disgrace and spitting.” Then, we read in Isaiah 52:14, “As many were astonied at you; his appearance was so defaced more than any man, and his structure more than the children of men.”

These, and different sections, give us an understanding of the horrendous, awful beatings the Lord persevered before going to the cross. We can undoubtedly perceive how He probably won’t have the option to convey the heaviness of His cross to Golgotha.

Thank you for always taking part in great Bible character stories with us. To make your day even more full of knowledge about Simon, please play the next trivia game about Simon’s Road to Calvary. May you be blessed with peace and strength from Heaven!

Quizlet about Simon and his road to Calvary

[ays_quiz id=”85″]

Bibliography

Westall, R. (2010). Simon of Cyrene, a Roman citizen?. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, (H. 4), 489-500.
Lyons, W. (2006). The Hermeneutics of Fictional Black and Factual Red: the Markan Simon of Cyrene and the Quest for the Historical Jesus. Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, 4(2), 139-154.
Bruggink, D. J. (1971). Simon of Cyrene. Donald J. Bruggink image collection.
Fentress, M. (2012). Simon of Cyrene. Commonweal, 139(13), 14.
Crowder, S. B. (2002). Simon of Cyrene: a case of Roman conscription. Lang.